Why real innovation needs products, teams, commercial models and operating discipline, not just labs, hackathons and a wall of sticky notes.
Most organisations have far more innovation activity than innovation output. Labs, hackathons, accelerators, innovation days, strategy offsites. The calendar is full. The product portfolio is not.
The problem is never a shortage of ideas. It is a shortage of the operating discipline it takes to turn an idea into something that works in the real world.
Innovation theatre has a familiar shape. A nicely branded space, a programme name, a process that moves ideas through stages of increasing polish. Everyone is enthusiastic. The sponsor turns up to the showcase. The outputs look promising.
Then the quarterly review lands. The "innovation projects" are not making money. They are not in the core business. Nobody owns their commercial performance. They fade, and the next cohort kicks off. I have sat in that review more than once.
Building a venture, whether inside a corporate, a government entity or as a standalone startup, needs five things innovation programmes rarely provide in full.
A clear commercial hypothesis: not "this technology is interesting" but "this customer will buy this product at this price for this reason."
Product discipline: the ability to decide what to build, build it, learn from real users and iterate, repeatedly, not once.
Operational ownership: a team that wakes up accountable for the venture's performance, not for the innovation programme's metrics.
Governance that enables speed: decision-making that lets a venture move fast while keeping the organisation informed enough to stay comfortable.
Capital patience: the recognition that ventures take time to become viable, and that killing them at the first hard quarter destroys the investment in the ones that would have made it.
This is unglamorous work. It is also the only kind that produces ventures that last. Innovation only counts when it survives contact with operations.
Alex Collins
Co-founder & COO at RAI Digital & Infinite PL · Ex-EY Consulting Partner · Writing on agentic AI, venture building, logistics platforms and transformation leadership.
One honest read every fortnight on what agentic AI is doing to consulting, and what to do about it. For people moving from advice to outcomes, rebuilding a firm, or done buying decks. No hype, no fluff.
My old university asked me back to lecture on the future of consulting. The honest version is that the "scissors of death" are closing on advice-only work, faster now that AI has grabbed one of the blades, and what replaces it is a better job than the one it ends.
When an AI rollout stalls, the problem is usually not the people but a half-redesigned operating model, and the fear you see is the signal that roles, workflows and how people are measured have not caught up with the tools.
The OECD says 97% of governments now use AI but only 28% measure whether it works. Why that gap is AI theatre, why the user is not at the centre, and why the fix is change management, not more technology.
